Polish and Hungarian friendship

Polish and Hungarian friendship
Views: 1305 | Added by: Polandball | Tags: Poland, Hungary
Total comments: 23
avatar
Not just friends !
More ...family!
avatar
How can they be family, Poland is Slavic and Hungary is Finno-Ugric?
avatar
This is much deep in history!
Hungary have been mixed with the slavic tribes. Ex croats .polens .czechs and the genes are similars too. And the history is similar .
Brotherhood and friendship .
avatar
Yes, correct, the Poles also come from Asia... biggrin oh, wait, that's only valid for the Hungarian Turkic tribes
avatar
Your actual family is the Turks, the Mongols, the Central Asia peoples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Kurult%C3%A1j
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Turanism
avatar
That still does not count
avatar
Say that to romanians with theire theories about the dacs.
Because what i say is more realistic not just theory
avatar
First of all the Dacians exist, see Traian's column and what you say is neither realistic or historical. Hungary and Poland have different language, the Hungarians have a Protestant religion and they have different cultures. They can be good friends but never a family
avatar
Maybe you're taking things too literally. Despite their differences they still consider themselves as "family" because of their long history together. It's not the literal "family" since both of them are from separate linguistic and genetic families but it's more of a formed by close friendship type like how most people these days consider their best friends as a part of their family. They even have a Hungarian-Polish Friendship Day to commemorate their historical brotherhood and camaraderie. So yes they are family to themselves but not the literal kind.
avatar
Im not saying dacs not exist.
Just the part with the romanians ancestors.what is invented by romanians because with the power thire live where we live .have no sense
avatar
The evidence that support the Daco-Romanian continuity theory has no sense, really? Audiatur et altera pars, sine ira et studio, pal, do not blindly swallow only the theories that fuel your Greater Hungary wet dreams

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Romanians
avatar
Man in the 19 century were ,,swag'' to say who were youre ancestors . And just because romania is on the dacias teritory doesnt count . You need to have more the write need to be similar the speaking etc...
And another one wikipedia say a lot of things and there not all is full thruth
avatar
What is not full of "thruth"? What are your NPOV sources to back your statements up? Have you even try to read that article or was it too hard for you to spell?
Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia with lots of good (and some bad) editors, but those articles are pretty neutral even this is a sensitive subject - and the statements there are backed up by reliable sources, not by what you heard at the local skinhead/Jobbik/Magyar Garda reunion over a bottle of palinka
avatar
Say that to romanians with theire theories about dacs.
1.*Their and the before romanians.
2.Of course you are not saying that, you just typed that.
avatar
What is the first picture supposed to depict? The fact that the Hungarians and the Polish had cavalry in the 1000's? Or that the Hungarians did not plunder and ravaged the Polish lands as they did with the East, Central and Western Europe in the 10th century and the beginning of the 11th? smile
avatar
Uhm what?

Ok...ok... but say me a country what ,,plunder and ravaged'' europe because hungary mostly defended europe from turks and mongols. when romania were under control .what ended in the midle of 19 century
avatar
What does one have to do with the other? This is a ridiculous, fallacious argument ("Yeah, we plundered and ravaged Europe at first, but then we protected you from other pillagers") biggrin Funny
Yes, Hungary defended Europe from the Turks (as also Wallachia and Moldavia did) until Mohács (1526). Then most of Hungary became the Pashaluk of Buda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budin_Eyalet) and effectively occupied by the Ottomans for circa 140 years, while Wallachia and Moldavia were not occupied by the Turks, only under Ottoman suzerainty (they had to pay tribute and the princes were appointed by the Sultan). Quite a difference between being sodomized every night by the Turks and paying not to be sodomized biggrin
avatar
Read here about which nomads pillaged and plundered Europe in the 9th and the 10th century:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_invasions_of_Europe
avatar
-2Spam
19 Anonymously
you idiots are taking it too litraly specialy you mentatus  he means family as in close friends soory for any bad spelling I am not english
avatar
Well, when you can't write in English, then you know who really the idiot is... Go back to your troll hole where you crawled out from
avatar
Why does Hungary look weird in 1526?
avatar
Probably Hungary was splitted.
avatar
Sorry but Kebab was attacking Hungary in 1241 and 1242, but cool!
avatar