
By mentatus
8 years ago is search

By Polandball
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By acrticfoxpt
8 years ago is search

By Polandball
8 years ago is search

By lmcguire
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Polandball
8 years ago is search

By borkball
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Polandball
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

By Guest
8 years ago is search

...
USA
Germany
Poland
United Kingdom
Rusia
France
Japan
China
Canada
Sweden
USSR
Italy
Finland
European Union
Greece
Nazi Germany
Spain
Turkey
Mexico
Switzerland
Brazil
Netherlands
Indonesia
Serbia
Israel
India
England
Hungary
Australia
Czech Republic
Romania
Belgium
Scotland
Estonia
North Korea
German Empire
Ireland
SPQR
Argentina
Portugal
South Korea
Wales
Iceland
United Nations
Vietnam
Lithuania
Greenland
Croatia
Cuba
Sealand
Pakistan
Syria
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Mongolia
Palestine
Saudi Arabia
Taiwan
Singapore
Bulgaria
Denmark
Norway
Philippines
Ukrane
Austria

oh, wait, that's only valid for the Hungarian Turkic tribes
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-putins-using-hungary-to-destroy-europe
https://staff.lib.msu.edu/sowards/balkan/lecture2.html
Hungary since 895 hun since 4. Cen.
Schita since bc dk exactly .
And if hungarians are non europeans we take everithing what we invented with us.
What about germans ?they migrated from the norther part of black sea.
And there are more nations what cannot show theire existence from 1000. Year so dfwhuns
The Germans coming from the Pontic-Caspian steppe?
And yes, the Hungarians (along with the Finns and the Estonians and the Proto-Indo-European Basque) are not Indo-Europeans. The latter 3 get along better with
And part with huns .is not completely true you say?
So i say part with the daco roman THEORY is more weaker
What is the evidence for the Hunnic heritage of the Hungarians, Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesta_Hunnorum_et_Hungarorum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns#Claims_of_Hunnic_heritage
I mean any daco roman stuff.
And youre history :
When dacia where conquered by rome for 100-200 years where enough for change the complet language. But under the turkish control for 500 or more years where not enough to change it.
And the latin origin ...ok ok u have too some ltin worda some not much . And in 19 century romania have a time when changed all or at least close all words to latin .
Do you have any idea how the Dacian language was or sounded like in order to make the comparison?
As for the Turkish control, there was never a direct Turkish occupation of the Romanian lands as it happened with the rest of the Balkans or the Eyalet of Buda. Even in the occupied territories, the Turks did not manage to change the structure or the vocabulary of the languages much, that's why Bulgarian and Serbian are still Slavic and Greek still Greek.
But there are not hibrid things like daco roman idk building etc.